Super Sara Sparkles
The suave presence and insouciant charm of Sara Sathyanandha cast a long spell over a magnificent Players’ Championships where folks are offered up to six tournaments over the two days in what is a merrily hectic affair. All gets resolved although the structure to find the winner remains a work in progress. We’ll get there, but the requisite for Dan Rovira to win 10/10 matches in a 128 draw was cruel and unusual punishment. More on that later, but let us savour the remarkable festival in that we enjoyed in Cecil Sharp’s majestic main hall.

The merging of the Inters with the Masters worked fine, with the low entry fee, and the bigwigs able to enter lots of sidepool action, which lessens the risk of too many players being swamped in a bad equity environ. And forget that, the giant-killing was everywhere. I slayed a couple myself, but in turn got dismantled by several who I fancied to beat. And what about Hazel Harper, getting two wins under her belt, and then pumping Lawrence Powell thoroughly in the debriefing room? He stumbled over the line for a 9-6, but Hazel was delighted to have run one of the greatest British match-players of all time, so close. A key reason why we love the game.
All Our Yesterdays
All around, the brave, the bold and the new mixed with legendary figures of the British game – in a wonderful patchwork of colour and chaos you so often get in our fabled game. Players in their ninth decades squared up against teenagers. Marvellous.
One recalls a young scamp called Peter Bennet kneeling at the feet of the master – Plato Tserliagkos – and begging to do a deal before the final at Cromwell’s Casino in Birmingham in 1983. Plato – playing for around $1,000 per point back then – wouldn’t hear of it, briskly swatting away the young whippersnapper. Peter won – £625 – a huge amount for him back then, and duly repeated the favour again here.
And then there was a time-warp back to 2004-5 when it was Barnes & Busato show going back and forth for about a year, both having outstanding seasons. And there they were locking horns again in the quarters here, neither aging a day:

One of the Great bluff doubles from Bertie Wooster’s pal
I had an incredibly tough opener with the PG Wodehouse inspired Alexander Pelling-Bruce, who plays a steady, calm game, and knew full well this wasn’t a cube at 7-6 [9] but also detected the skittish, panicky nature of his squirming opponent:

Of course I must take this and play out for the match, but made that dreadful blunder so many make of choosing delayed execution: “Oh, I’ll just outplay and grind him down in the last two – no need to just let him cruise to a non-skill, easy racing win.” But I had no idea Alex was only 63% here, thought it was more like 73%. But one fan and he’s actually in quite big trouble. Anyway, I passed, lost the next in a horror sicko, and can only have myself to blame. You can’t expect to go on deep runs making catastrophic blunders like this. As ever with me it’s a case of DSR [deeper study required].
The DSR mistress
A potential great women’s find is Becca Sweetman, who insists on DSR at all times. I know that we’re all supposed to go through every match on Galaxy or XG analyse every blob of all colours. But do I? No. Why not? Because it’s too damn hard. It’s boring, onerous and makes my head hurt. Oh so slowly I am starting to review more, but still nothing like 100%. Maybe 40? But Becca, who has never read a book and only in her second live tourney, does go through every blob, or else, “I’m just wasting my time.” Hence her extremely rapid rise. Becca is also on Team GB for mounted archery – surely one of the toughest sports in the world. I haven’t posted a mounted archery picture for ages, so here’s Becca in action.

A pleasing youth policy
Miranda Moulton picked up more wins with her steady ascent in the game, but of even more note was the 18-year old Jonathan Sher, son of Martin [winner of London Masters in March], who decapacitated the author in the Consolation in an astonishing match, three times hitting me from the roof in two games with the 30-1 parlay of my rolling the high 55/66/65 and him smacking. 27,000-1?! Meh, I doth protest too much – JS played a fine match.

Turning cantankerous into an art form
After losing to Peter, Plato then had an excellent run to the Quarter-finals, before evergreen Dan Rovira ground him down. Dan has a fiddly play here to leave himself awkward at the back and he would duly leave shots. I think at one stage Dan may have gently touched the roof of his mouth with his tongue, and a tiny sound may have emerged. Was it a tut?! And if it was?! Minor hell broke loose as Plato lambasted Dan for “tutting from a winning position”. Dan looked suitably bewildered perhaps not realising that Plato has been doing “cantankerous as an artform” since the Seventies. It’s all part of his schtick. Dan, whilst a little shell-shocked by the hairdryer treatment duly settled the account.

Spirit of the Game – A Farthing of kindness
At the other extreme, the good sportsman award goes to Adrian Farthing who observed Michael Flesch pick and pass but not put the checker on the roof. Alan was fully within his right to let the play stand, but instead he pointed out the error and told MF to send his man back. Michael replied that the play should stand, it was his error. Alan insisted, feeling that Michael saw the play even though I believe the non-hit may have been available. A lovely little gesture – more of this please people!
Gorgeous George full of the joys of spring
I had a terrific match with George Jacobs, all but becalming him several times. But George isn’t #66 in the land due to not knowing how to win matches; he’s certainly not there for his PR [which he readily admits and revels in]. I was surprised after hitting twice in a coup classique that I didn’t really know when to cube. But it’s all about the score and where my spares were. I tried this:

I am actually a little early, and George’s pass is a .355 blunder. To his credit though, George shipped in a seriously good cube in a priming game earlier that about 3% would have had the courage for.
Get Carter
Richard Carter had been on the beers by the time he got around to me on Saturday night. What a howitzer cube this is. What on earth?!
Heh, there are action doubles and then this! The hit with the deuce would justify the cube, but as things stand, a double whopper with cheese. The match was the Lucky loser last-16, so hardly important, and the amber nectar will have helped matters along…
A complex cube against Radu
I had a tense match in the consolation against Radu Ciortan which ended up being a whitewash to me. Radu is perhaps one of the most intimidating players on tour with his severe demeanour over the checkers. Would I have gotten more out of XG in terms of human interaction? Perhaps, but that is no criticism of Radu: he’s there to win a backgammon match not to partake in a sewing circle. Backgammon matches does turn some of us into machines, and playing such a match in these conditions can feel a tad joyless, but goodness we had some absorbing games.
What say you to my cube here to Radu at 4-0 to 7?!

Heh, I may be 70.5% with 16% gammons, but this is far too big. A terrible .35’er. Whoopsie daisy. All about the score of course. Radu snatched with delight and I was soon in big trouble, and he may even have missed a chance for the super-duper rewhip to 4.
The Quarter-final line up
The last 8 merged the winner of the undefeated with the rest, and yes, I’m coming back to that! Here they are:
| Dan Rovira |
Platon Tserliagkos
|
|
| Reza Zarei | Tiberiu Bostan | |
| Jon Barnes | Walter Busato | |
|
Saravanan Sathyanandha
|
Wesley Howell |
We particularly like the look of Wesley Howell, pictured, another unsung Galaxy star who it’s good to see in flesh and blood… welcome indeed, and watch him go now. This tournament alone sees him leap from 900 to 400 in the UK rankings.

Sweetman Turns Sour
Becca had a great semi-final in the Consolation with the above Alex P-B, and cubed at 81.8% at 5-3 [7] which was one of those hideously complex too goods, and Alex’s take was about .1 incorrect, but good luck finding it. He promptly hurled back to 4, and it duly came down to Becca just needing to avoid the horror shot-leaving 62. Out it popped.
Check out humanity in all its forms here! Becca recoils in the face of machine gun fire, whilst Mike Ireland flinches at the mayhem of Alex’s fatal 21. And Alex now has a quandary. The hit he knows [and has accomplished], but does he lift the blot on his 6 – a point he’d dearly like to make?

Alex is quite correct to lift. Simply not enough ammo to cover, especially with two burnt. Besides, he’s levelling up the race anyhow.
The Grand final
So, two of the hottest guns in the land made the final, both with pretty stratospheric rises through the ranks. Sara keeps a beady eye on Dan here with an extremely scary-looking cube. Too scary as it goes, this is too good, at 71% with 48% gammons. Dan got out the way.

At 4-6 Dan shipped in a promising cube, but promptly got gammoned for match, and we had our winner, pleasingly surround by wife, father and other friends and family. Lovely moments, and clearly a great selection by Geoff Hall in the recent Magriel Cup.
Danny not Champion of the World in this format!
So – yes – the only way for Dan to win the 128 draw tournament was to win 10 in a row, which is wildly out. I know this was in reaction to Pete Heskett having about half a day off at the UK Open, but this went too far the other way. I remain convinced that one of 16, 24 or 32 should qualify for the Sunday, and you get there by Swiss and ties decided by shoot-outs or possibly mounted archery [see above]. It’s important to find a format that is the “least worst option”, and we know for sure that Leamington and Players were not it. I firmly believe that Blackpool and Cambridge came closest. And I like what all the European football leagues are now doing of the top 8 being rewarded with a place in the last 16, and then 9-24 play a qualifier [on the Sunday morning].
Precious few meltdowns for the D/J
Finally huge thanks to David and Jill on the front desk, with Andrew roaming freely in his role as BGs answer to Kofi Annan. There was a lot going on, and only perhaps three meltdowns and bottlenecks in the event? And one computer crash. Many byes needed working out too, as in here, as Noah Bernstein creams his way to the Consolation final due to a nifty little coin flip. Nice work if you can get it, and he proceeded to win a thrilling match with Alex – two more great finds from the weekend. Noah bats at a phenomenal win rate of 60.8% in his career; and 97-52 for the year. Bonkers but brilliant.

“the only way for Dan to win the 128 draw tournament was to win 10 in a row”
This is not really true because he didn’t have to win in round 7 against Sara. Both players went into the last 8 from that match. In terms of the format, that match might as well not have been played (but I believe there was some prize bonus for the winner), so it’s more accurate to say that both Dan and Sara had to win nine in a row, given that they won the first six.
“one of 16, 24 or 32 should qualify for the Sunday, and you get there by Swiss and ties”
Imagine having a five-round Swiss on Saturday and a last 32 knockout on Sunday. If two players on 4/4 are told to play their fifth Swiss match even though they both qualify anyway, would you claim that the winner of that match “had to win 10 in a row” to become champion?
The format at the Players Championship, if there had been a full 128 entrants, was effectively the same as a 7-round Swiss, with all eight players on a 7-0 or 6-1 record going through to the KO stage.
Just quickly – if it was down to me, in a 5 round Swiss, all who go 4/4 are waved through to Sunday, no questions asked, as the top qualifiers to boot, with no need to play the 5th. In fact, in a 128 that’s a beauty, because it would almost be guaranteed to be 8 of them. And then 16 players going for the rest in the last 32 9-24 bracket.
Anyway, Dan did win against Sara in their play-off, so the 10/10 requisite was there, that’s my only point.
I strongly believe the best way to separate others in a Swiss is that the longer you go without losing, the better. Ie. The players attempting to qualify for the final spots with 2 losses would be separated thus:
WWWLL
WWLWL
WWLLW
WLWWL
WLWLW
WLLWW
WWLWL
WLWLW
LWLWW
This keeps a nice little hold on the traditional format of not losing for as long as possible, and would vastly bring down the necessity for the dmp shoot-outs to just a few players. For instance, the top few get through to the 9-24 bracket, and a play-off only required for about 8 players, down from the current 16-20 or so.
And I think losing the first two matches does bar one from winning the tournament. It’s fair enough. 32 souls go into Saturday’s lucky loser, which I really enjoyed, and still has a worthwhile pot.
Always interesting write ups Will but (whether meant in jest or not) you do Radu a great disservice. I have both played with and observed him many times and not only is he a great player, he’s a gentleman and highly respected and popular. Give me Radu and his seriousness to play the game as well as he can over the many players I hear moaning about their dice and luck. Radu does not do that
Absolutely agreed. He has been extremely benevolent to me over the last couple of years.
I think it may be connected to the first game where he tried a rather torrid, dicily timed backgame which went badly wrong for the 0-4 start. And I think he really battened down the hatches after that. I absolutely don’t say that he was not gentlemanly, just severe in demeanour. I have seen World Championship finals and semi-finals played in very friendly spirit so it’s important that we don’t let the game get tooooo heavy. But no criticism, all I said was it was darn serious stuff.
Two of the greatest British sports stars of the last 50 years, Nick Faldo and Steve Davis are very nice, humorous, friendly, guys off the course and the green baize, but totally focussed and serious on it, with precious little wit and repartee.
I think probably what tripped me up here is that Radu has been super sweet and friendly to me this year away from the checkers, so I was wondering what happened to my pal! What happened was he was in a match and switched to beast mode. Absolutely fair enough, and I make that point clearly.
Great write-up again Will; always interesting to read. I missed lots of what was going on whilst having my own good run; not being knocked out of the Main until Sunday afternoon was an unusual experience for me and somewhat unexpected given the size and quality of the field.
Well done to the winner and near-winners as it was quite a marathon!
huge congrats Rowena. That really was a super tourny you had. Warranted a menche in the text, but sooooo much going on. To win four of your first five is quite outstanding. Proud of you!
Loved the tournament; got to meet up with some longtime backgammon friends and also met new people. Intermediates and Masters in one group worked fine for me. Had a decent run on Sunday after a disastrous round on Saturday. Happy Christmas to y’all and see you again in the New Year !
Yep, a 6 out of 7 win run, tidy! Congrats. See you soon.
Though I attend very few tournaments I’m always pleased to read Will’s colourful reports of his and others’ live backgammon exploits! This one is a veritable ‘war and peace’ offering, aptly suited to the very game itself. Virtually worth the annual UKBGF membership in itself. Great stuff Will.
Huge thx for your honeyed words. Come and see us again soon. I think we got you for Bristol. Best, W
Each to their own I guess Jules…
Perhaps, but this is no criticism of the reports, I find them like eating a word salad sprinkled with lightly toasted analogies but not as joyful as playing against a strong player who plays without delay and lets their plays do the waffling.
and its Pete HeskeTT btw
thanks Ian, corrected.
I like the description of lightly toasted analogy – I’ll take that!
And thanks too for offering no criticism of my reports, although not sure if my editors would accept me filing ‘word salad’!:
“Word salad is a term used to describe a confused or meaningless mixture of words and phrases when speaking.
“Word salads can be found in various contexts but are especially common among people with certain mental health conditions or neurological disorders such as schizophrenia or dementia.”
Brown University. The Mental Status Examination.
Will… who are you kidding here: ‘The merging of the Inters with the Masters worked fine, with the low entry fee, and the bigwigs able to enter lots of sidepool action, which lessens the risk of too many players being swamped in a bad equity environ.’
this is pure fantasy.
‘ on DSR at all times.’? what does that mean?
Why can’t these tournaments be just a straight single elim knockout… and when you lose you are done and have one progressive consol and then go home if you want to buy into another tournament you do. but not so many lucky losers and other nonesense…
Hi, what is wrong with the sentence you quote? It is perfectly fair comment. I didn’t get the sense that any of the lesser players felt swamped and many went on fantastic runs. Where is the fantasy in that?
I very clearly define DSR two lines earlier.
The question of why these tournaments aren’t single elimination is now an accepted part and parcel format of backgammon tournaments, big and small, the world over. It insures against the shock horror swift loss that this game can throw up, and people really savour getting that second chance. As for the lucky loser – I played in it, good fun, very intense action indeed and a prize well worth winning. Not nonsense at all. The tournament gives players 3 matches a day – an excellent return. I had a bad day on Saturday, but was still out there playing for about 7 hours, and really enjoyed it.
Well said Will and I too love your tournament write up(s) Great stuff !
Jason, if you don’t like the Double elim format and all “the other nonsense”, you could always pretend it is Single Elim and go home as soon as you lose…….
Great solution! Personally, if I’m blocking out the calendar for a weekend of BG and travelling several hundred miles, invariably for hours, I want at least 3 matches in a day.
As for Will’s write-ups I really enjoy reading them and I suspect the majority of members do too.